23 August 2015

CEO of Debt Collection Agency Sentenced for Role in Multi-Million Dollar Fraud Scheme

Description or overview about the company?

What was the fraud about?

How they were getting along before they got caught?

Who was involved in the fraud?

How they discovered the fraud?

Who got punished? for how long?

How much fine did they have to pay?

23 August 2015,
 0

CEO of Debt Collection Agency Sentenced for Role in Multi-Million Dollar Fraud Scheme Description or overview about the company? What was the fraud about? […]


23 August 2015

Business and ManagementPaper instructions:
business plan about any business with detailed charts and expenditures. This should contain how will the business be funded for the first 3 years, when can the business expect to see profit, what are the expenditures for the first 5 years, and a detailed view of the business.

23 August 2015,
 0

Business and ManagementPaper instructions:business plan about any business with detailed charts and expenditures. This should contain how will the business be funded for the […]


23 August 2015

Coca cola1
Classical Case on Marketing Failure
New Coke
Think of a brand success story, and you may well think of Coca-Cola. Indeed, with nearly 1 billion
Coca-Cola drinks sold every single day, it is the world’s most recognized brand.
Yet in 1985 the Coca-Cola Company decided to terminate its most popular soft drink and replace it
with a formula it would market as New Coke. To understand why this potentially disastrous decision
was made, it is necessary to appreciate what was happening in the soft drinks marketplace. In
particular, we must take a closer look at the growing competition between Coca-Cola and Pepsi-Cola
in the years and even decades prior to the launch of New Coke.
The relationship between the arch-rivals had not been a healthy one. Although marketing experts have
believed for a long time that the competition between the two companies had made consumers more
cola-conscious, the firms themselves rarely saw it like that. Indeed, the Coca-Cola company had even
fought Pepsi-Cola in a legal battle over the use of the word ‘cola’ in its name, and lost.
Outside the courts though, Coca-Cola had always been ahead. Shortly after World War II, Time
magazine was already celebrating Coke’s ‘peaceful near-conquest of the world.’ In the late 1950s,
Coke outsold Pepsi by a ratio of more than five to one. However, during the next decade Pepsi
repositioned itself as a youth brand.
This strategy was a risky one as it meant sacrificing its older customers to Coca-Cola, but ultimately it
proved successful. By narrowing its focus, Pepsi was able to position its brand against the old and
classic image of its competitor. As it became increasingly seen as ‘the drink of youth’ Pepsi managed
to narrow the gap.
In the 1970s, Coke’s chief rival raised the stakes even further by introducing the Pepsi Challenge –
testing consumers blind on the difference between its own brand and ‘the real thing’. To the horror of
Coca-Cola’s longstanding company president, Robert Woodruff, most of those who participated
preferred Pepsi’s sweeter formula.
In the 1980s Pepsi continued its offensive, taking the Pepsi Challenge around the globe and heralding
the arrival of the ‘Pepsi Generation’. It also signed up celebrities likely to appeal to its target market
such as Don Johnson and Michael Jackson (this tactic has survived into the new millennium, with
figures like Britney Spears and Robbie Williams providing more recent endorsements).
By the time Roberto Goizueta became chairman in 1981, Coke’s number one status was starting to
look vulnerable. It was losing market share not only to Pepsi but also to some of the drinks produced
2
by the Coca-Cola company itself, such as Fanta and Sprite. In particular the runaway success of Diet
Coke was a double-edged sword, as it helped to shrink the sugar cola market. In 1983, the year Diet
Coke moved into the number three position behind standard Coke and Pepsi, Coke’s market share had
slipped to an all-time low of just under 24 per cent.
Something clearly had to be done to secure Coke’s supremacy. Goizueta’s first response to the ‘Pepsi
Challenge’ phenomenon was to launch an advertising campaign in 1984, praising Coke for being less
sweet than Pepsi. The television ads were fronted by Bill Cosby, at that time one of the most familiar
faces on the planet, and clearly someone who was too old to be part of the Pepsi Generation.
The impact of such efforts to set Coca-Cola apart from its rival was limited. Coke’s share of the
market remained the same while Pepsi was catching up. Another worry was that when shoppers had
the choice, such as in their local supermarket, they tended to plump for Pepsi. It was only Coke’s more
effective distribution which kept it ahead. For instance, there were still considerably more vending
machines selling Coke than Pepsi. Even so, there was no getting away from the fact that despite the
proliferation of soft drink brands, Pepsi was winning new customers. Having already lost on taste, the
last thing Coca-Cola could afford was to lose its number one status.
The problem, as Coca-Cola perceived it, came down to the product itself. As the Pepsi Challenge had
highlighted millions of times over, Coke could always be defeated when it came down to taste. This
seemed to be confirmed by the success of Diet Coke which was closer to Pepsi in terms of flavour. So
in what must have been seen as a logical step, Coca-Cola started working on a new formula. A year
later they had arrived at New Coke. Having produced its new formula, the Atlanta-based company
conducted 200,000 taste tests to see how it fared. The results were overwhelming. Not only did it taste
better than the original, but people preferred it to Pepsi-Cola as well.
However, if Coca-Cola was to stay ahead of Pepsi-Cola it couldn’t have two directly competing
products on the shelves at the same time. It therefore decided to scrap the original Coca-Cola and
introduced New Coke in its place.
The trouble was that the Coca-Cola company had severely underestimated the power of its first brand.
As soon as the decision was announced, a large percentage of the US population immediately decided
to boycott the new product. On 23 April 1985 New Coke was introduced and a few days later the
production of original Coke was stopped. This joint decision has since been referred to as ‘the biggest
marketing blunder of all time’. Sales of New Coke were low and public outrage was high at the fact
that the original was no longer available.
It soon became clear that Coca-Cola had little choice but to bring back its original brand and formula.
‘We have heard you,’ said Goizueta at a press conference on 11 July 1985. He then left it to the
3
company’s chief operating officer Donald Keough to announce the return of the product. Keough
admitted:
“The simple fact is that all the time and money and skill poured into consumer research on the new
Coca-Cola could not measure or reveal the deep and abiding emotional attachment to original
Coca-Cola felt by so many people. The passion for original Coca-Cola – and that is the word for it,
passion – was something that caught us by surprise. It is a wonderful American mystery, a lovely
American enigma, and you cannot measure it any more than you can measure love, pride or
patriotism.”
In other words, Coca-Cola had learnt that marketing is about much more than the product itself. The
majority of the tests had been carried out blind, and therefore taste was the only factor under
assessment. The company had finally taken Pepsi’s bait and, in doing so, conceded its key brand asset:
originality.
When Coca-Cola was launched in the 1880s it was the only product in the market. As such, it invented
a new category and the brand name became the name of the product itself. Throughout most of the last
century, Coca-Cola capitalized on its ‘original’ status in various advertising campaigns. In 1942,
magazine adverts appeared across the United States declaring: ‘The only thing like Coca-Cola is
Coca-Cola itself. It’s the real thing.’ By launching New Coke, Coca-Cola was therefore contradicting
its previous marketing efforts. Its central product hadn’t been called new since the very first advert
appeared in the Atlanta Journal in 1886, billing Coca-Cola as ‘The New Pop Soda Fountain Drink,
containing the properties of the wonderful Coca-plant and the famous Cola nuts.’
In 1985, a century after the product launched, the last word people associated with Coca-Cola was
‘new’. This was the company with more allusions to US heritage than any other. Fifty years previously,
the Pulitzer Prize winning editor of a Kansas newspaper, William Allen White had referred to the soft
drink as the ‘sublimated essence of all America stands for – a decent thing, honestly made, universally
distributed, conscientiously improved with the years.’ Coca-Cola had even been involved with the
history of US space travel, famously greeting Apollo astronauts with a sign reading ‘Welcome back to
earth, home of Coca-Cola.’
To confine the brand’s significance to a question of taste was therefore completely misguided. As with
many big brands, the representation was more significant than the thing represented, and if any soft
drink represented ‘new’ it was Pepsi, not Coca-Cola (even though Pepsi is a mere decade younger).
If you tell the world you have the ‘real thing’ you cannot then come up with a ‘new real thing’. To
borrow the comparison of marketing guru Al Ries it’s ‘like introducing a New God’. This
contradictory marketing message was accentuated by the fact that, since 1982, Coke’s strap line had
been ‘Coke is it’. Now it was telling consumers that they had got it wrong, as if they had discovered
4
Coke wasn’t it, but rather New Coke was instead.
So despite the tremendous amount of hype which surrounded the launch of New Coke (one estimate
puts the value of New Coke’s free publicity at over US $10 million), it was destined to fail. Although
Coca-Cola’s market researchers knew enough about branding to understand that consumers would go
with their brand preference if the taste tests weren’t blind, they failed to make the connection that
these brand preferences would still exist once the product was launched.
Pepsi was, perhaps unsurprisingly, the first to recognize Coca-Cola’s mistake. Within weeks of the
launch, it ran a TV ad with an old man sitting on a park bench, staring at the can in his hand. ‘They
changed my Coke,’ he said, clearly distressed. ‘I can’t believe it.’
However, when Coca-Cola relaunched its original coke, redubbed ‘Classic Coke’ for the US market,
the media interest swung back in the brand’s favour. It was considered a significant enough event to
warrant a newsflash on ABC News and other US networks. Within months Coke had returned to the
number one spot and New Coke had all but faded away.
Ironically, through the brand failure of New Coke loyalty to ‘the real thing’ intensified. In fact, certain
conspiracy theorists have even gone so far as to say the whole thing had been planned as a deliberate
marketing ploy to reaffirm public affection for Coca-Cola. After all, what better way to make someone
appreciate the value of your global brand than to withdraw it completely?
Of course, Coca-Cola has denied that this was the company’s intention. ‘Some critics will say
Coca-Cola made a marketing mistake, some cynics will say that we planned the whole thing,’ said
Donald Keough at the time. ‘The truth is we are not that dumb, and we are not that smart.’ But viewed
in the context of its competition with Pepsi, the decision to launch New Coke was understandable. For
years, Pepsi’s key weapon had been the taste of its product. By launching New Coke, the Coca-Cola
company clearly hoped to weaken its main rival’s marketing offensive.
So what was Pepsi’s verdict on the whole episode? In his book, The Other Guy Blinked, Pepsi’s CEO
Roger Enrico believes the error of New Coke proved to be a valuable lesson for Coca-Cola. ‘I think,
by the end of their nightmare, they figured out who they really are. Caretakers. They can’t change the
taste of their flagship brand. They can’t change its imagery. All they can do is to defend the heritage
they nearly abandoned in 1985.’
5
Discussion Questions:
1. What factors led to Coca-Cola’s huge initial popularity?
2. What was Pepsi’s strategy?
3. Coca-Cola responded with New Coke: what happened as a result?
4. How did Coca-Cola end up making such a big mistake?
5. What would you have done?
6. What lessons can we learn?

23 August 2015,
 0

Coca cola1Classical Case on Marketing FailureNew CokeThink of a brand success story, and you may well think of Coca-Cola. Indeed, with nearly 1 billionCoca-Cola […]


23 August 2015

Parents are children's first teachers in the first language acquisition

Parents are children's first teachers in the first language acquisition

23 August 2015,
 0

Parents are children's first teachers in the first language acquisition Parents are children's first teachers in the first language acquisition Click here for more […]


23 August 2015

The House of the Scorpion is a great book

The House of the Scorpion is a great book


23 August 2015,
 0

The House of the Scorpion is a great book The House of the Scorpion is a great book Click here for more on this […]


‹ Prev page1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 Next page ›