26 August 2015

Theories of Knowledge and Reality Heller
PHI 107 Theories of Knowledge and Reality
Heller

TERM PAPER


Assignment:
·         Write a paper engaging with some material that we have discussed in class this semester.
·         The term paper will be 5 pages and written in two stages—a draft and a final submission. (If you need to go beyond 5 pages, that is acceptable, within reason.)
·         The draft is due on Thursday, April 17th. (This is a change from the original syllabus.) You will turn in a hard copy in class and also email a copy to your TA.
·         Write the draft as if it were a final paper. So, it may well be your second or third draft. Make it as good as you can. It will then receive comments and be returned to you within a week.
·         You will then rewrite the paper in light of the comments. I expect significant changes and not just minor grammatical repairs. The final submission will be held to higher standards than the draft was.
·         The final draft will be due on the day of the final exam–Friday, May 2nd. (This is also a change from the original syllabus.)

Goal: This is your opportunity to make an original philosophical point. It should also give you some practice writing clearly about abstract ideas.

Topics: You should pick a small but interesting point that is connected to the topics we have discussed in class. Your job is to make a claim and defend it. Here are some places you might want to look for topics:
·         Develop something said in class.
o   Example: On such-and-such date Heller said …. I will argue that he is wrong about that.
o   OR: On such-and-such date Heller said …. I will add further support to his claim.
·         I have posted two articles on Blackboard that we did not discuss in class, one by Jackson and one by Hobart. You can read either of those articles and pick a point in that article to either disagree with or to add further support to that.
·         Here are three specific examples of topics, so that you can see the sorts of things I have in mind:
o   One might think that in order to know something we only have to rule out all of all of the relevant ways we might be wrong (e.g. misreading something, being lied to, etc) and not the crazy ones (e.g. being deceived by an evil demon). You might want to suggest criteria for distinguishing between relevant possibilities and crazy ones and argue that those are good criteria.

o   The following is an argument for the identity theory:
1. Whenever you report being in pain, we observe that c-fibers in your brain are firing.
2. The simplest explanation for why this is is that pain and c-fibers are the same thing.
3. We should believe the simplest explanation for what we observe.              
THEREFORE: We should believe that pain and c-fibers are identical.
You might want to try to respond to the argument by challenging one of the premises

o   The mad scientist objection against compatibilism relies upon the claim that the case of a mad scientist's controlling your character is in all relevant respects like the case of the past and the laws of nature determining your character. You might want to argue that there are relevant respects in which the two cases differ and that this undermines the objection.

How to write a philosophy paper
(mostly written by Ted Towner)

Overview: The paper you will be writing for this class is an argumentative essay.  That is, in it, you must give reasons in support of some claim.  Your paper ought to begin with an introduction that culminates in a thesis sentence.  In the body of the paper, you must outline any views that you discuss and clearly articulate your reasons for or against those views.  After you have given your arguments, you ought to consider how someone might object to your arguments, and then you must respond to these objections.  Finally, you should conclude with a summation of your paper.  Your paper should not contain anything extraneous to the thesis. Your paper should contain citations where appropriate.

The thesis sentence should be the final sentence of your introductory paragraph. The thesis sentence is a one sentence statement of what you will argue for in your paper, for example:

“In this paper, I will argue that it is sometimes permissible to break one’s promises when doing so would allow us to avoid great harms to ourselves and others.”

Do not argue for something too broad or overly ambitious, such as:

“In this paper, I will argue that dualism is true.”

Restrict your paper to addressing one or two arguments for a position or view.  Don’t attempt to address all of them.  Do a few things well rather than a lot of things poorly. 

Do not argue for something uncontroversial or uninteresting:

“In this paper, I will argue that slavery is evil.”

Your introduction should be lean.  Don’t waste time on writing fluff:

“Since the dawn of time, mankind has wondered about knowledge”

Your introduction should provide background to the reader that will show the reader why your thesis is important or interesting. For instance, if you were going to argue for the thesis above that says that lying is sometimes permissible, you would want your introductory paragraph to provide a brief description of why some people  might think that lying is never permissible. (As an example, the influential philosopher Immanuel Kant is often interpreted as claiming that lying is never permissible.)

A useful short second paragraph would provide a roadmap in which you outline when you will talk about what.  Make it so your reader has a good idea of what to expect while going through the paper. For example,

“First, I will outline x’s view that…”  “I will then discuss an important claim that this view relies on…”  “I will then discuss two reasons to doubt this claim. First….and second….” “I will then discuss an objection to my argument that says that…”

You may have been told in your other courses that that these sorts of “framework” sentences telling the reader what you are about to do are stylistically weak. But in philosophy clarity is more important that elegance. We love the framework sentences. In fact, it is often useful to include them as the first sentence of the more confusing paragraphs. For example: “I will now present my opponent's objection.” Remember how much easier it would have been to read Descartes if he had used sentences like that.

The body of the paper should contain an accurate description of the view you are criticizing or defending from a criticism.  If there are any technical terms that the reader needs to understand in order to understand the view, make sure you clarify what you mean. 

When giving your argument, clearly state your own reasons and why someone who disagrees with you ought to be convinced.  It’s not sufficient to just point out there is some other view that someone (namely you!) has.  You need to try to convince the person in the other camp.  If you’re defending a view, it’s not sufficient to just say that you agree.  You need to contribute something to the debate in answering a potential criticism or providing additional reasons to think some view or argument is correct.

For example you might try to argue against some view by demonstrating how it leads to unintuitive or unacceptable consequences.  The strategy involves teasing out what is implied by your opponents’ view and showing them that there are convincing counterexamples. For instance:

“Some people claim that lying is always wrong.  But this would imply that, if a known serial killer approached me and asked me to reveal the location of a dear friend of mine with the intent to kill, it would be wrong of me to lie about my friend’s location.  But, surely, it’s not wrong for me lie about my friend’s location.” (Kant discusses a case like this in his Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, 1785.)

Or you might argue by way of offering an analogy:

“Some people claim that, if fetuses have a right to life, then abortion is never permissible.  But consider the following analogy.  In the case of rape, the situation is like one in which a person is kidnapped by a group of people and bodily hooked up to you in such a way that that person will die if she or he does not remain hooked up to you for the next 9 months. Since this person is hooked up to you, your bodily freedom would be greatly constrained for the duration of this arrangement.  Is it the case that you are obligated to remain attached to this person for 9 months?  It seems not.  It seems that it is permissible for you to reject the arrangement and remove yourself, thus freeing your body.  This situation is analogous to what happens when a woman is raped.  So, at least in the case of rape, the fact that the fetus has a right to life does not mean that is impermissible to abort it.” (This example is borrowed from Judith Jarvis Thomson, “A Defense of Abortion,” Philosophy and Public Affairs (1971), pp. 47–66.)

In these cases, the person posing the argument is not merely registering their disagreement.  They are offering reasons they expect their opponents to find convincing.

The conclusion of the paper should summarize what you have done in your paper; for example:

“I have argued that ….”  “I supported this thesis by ….”  “I considered the objection …, and responded by showing that ….”

This sort of summary seems silly in such a short paper, but it is good practice for longer papers. Also, it is surprising how often a reader will misunderstand what you were trying to do until after you explicitly tell them what you thought you did.

Plagiarism: It is always important to properly credit the originator of an idea. If you represent someone else's idea as your own, you are plagiarizing. Plagiarism will be dealt with harshly, resulting in an F for the course and a report to the university authorities, typically accompanied by a transcript notation indicating that the course failure resulted from a violation of Academic Integrity Policy. (See the academic integrity policy at http://coursecatalog.syr.edu/2013/rules/3383_academic_integrity)

Any resource you use, including websites, needs to be cited. Furthermore the citation you use needs to be detailed enough so that the reader of your paper can find the information that you are referring to. If you directly use someone else's words, those words should appear within quotation marks and be accompanied by a citation. If you paraphrase someone else's ideas, restating them in your own words, you still need to acknowledge the source of the ideas with an appropriate citation.

If you go through your entire paper appropriately citing all of your sources and discover that there is nothing left that is not cited, then you are not guilty of plagiarism but you are guilty of a lack of originality. For example, if you were to copy someone else's paper, and put the whole thing within quotation marks and cite the source, you would not be guilty of plagiarism, but you would still fail the assignment for lack of originality.



26 August 2015,
 0

Theories of Knowledge and Reality Heller PHI 107 Theories of Knowledge and Reality Heller TERM PAPER Assignment: ·         Write a paper engaging with some […]


26 August 2015

Canterbury Tales or paradise lost

For your essay (to be turned in between 3/17 and 4/17), you will create an argument for one or more possible readings of a text of your choice. You will base your argument on a close reading that focuses on one particular element of that text. You are welcome to speak with me about the element you choose after any class or during any Tuesday office hours.

Examples of particular elements include but are not limited to: a striking or repeating image, a set of related images, a specific kind of vocabulary, a turn or a tonal shift, a structural element like form or rhyme scheme, a narrative element like point of view, a striking or crucial scene, a seemingly extraneous scene, etc.

Before you begin, you should be able to describe this element, but you do not need to know how it works in the text. Think of your writing process as an investigation into the text that tries to uncover how this element influences the meaning of the larger poem, story, essay, or novel. You will consider why the element you choose might exist in the text, what it achieves, what it implies, and how it supports or hinders other elements, arguments, or meaning within the text.
This essay will require you to incorporate one outside source that you find though the library website (www.lib.ua.edu). You should do this research after you determine your topic. You may use your outside source in any part of your essay (as a jumping-off point, as a counterargument, as support for one point of an argument you are making, etc.). Remember that your essay is about the poem, story, essay, or novel you have chosen, not about the outside source.

For help using the library website, please follow the directions posted on BlackBoard for finding Dipasquale’s essay on the “harmonious chime” in Donne’s “To His Mistress Going to Bed.” Her essay, posted on BlackBoard with explanatory annotations, will also help you understand what a close textual analysis is. Notice that the particular element she chose to write about was only two words of the poem, “harmonious chime,” though she used other parts of the poem and outside sources to help support her argument about it.

*

Essays will be graded according to your ability to choose a specific element of a text to analyze, to develop and support an extended reading of it or argument about it, to incorporate one outside text into this argument, to organize this argument logically and coherently, and to write without distracting mechanical errors.

Your essay must be a minimum of 4 full pages, double-spaced, Times New Roman, with 1-inch margins. Essays that fall short of this requirement will be penalized, as will late essays.

26 August 2015,
 0

Canterbury Tales or paradise lost For your essay (to be turned in between 3/17 and 4/17), you will create an argument for one or […]


26 August 2015

How would you design a system for new FHSU students to gain the 'knowledge' from graduating studentsPaper instructions:
It's amazing how much knowledge a student can build throughout their academic career. How would you design a system for new FHSU students to gain the 'knowledge' from graduating students? Why do you think no such 'KMS' currently exists within FHSU? What features/topics would you include in such a system?

26 August 2015,
 0

How would you design a system for new FHSU students to gain the 'knowledge' from graduating studentsPaper instructions:It's amazing how much knowledge a student […]


26 August 2015

Ellements of reasoning

There are eight elements of thought in reasoning. We often use more than one element at the same time. For example, your “Point of View” is often shaped by your “Assumptions”. Therefore, we can argue that these two elements are aspects of the same reasoning.
Analyze the parts of thought in reasoning and re-organize the eight elements into four distinct categories by pairing elements together similar to the example above. Briefly describe each new category you created and present your argument and reasoning for each category. Include the characteristics of the original eight Using the 8 elements of reasoning from above pairing (Purpose, problem, information, concepts, assumptions, inferences, points of view, implications or consequences) choose a news article and break it down according to those elements. You will also describe how each of the 8 intellectual standards (clarity, accuracy, precision, relevance, depth, breadth, logic, and fairness) were used or not used in the article, supported by an example. The conclusion of your paper will then need to describe how you feel the article is biased. Please be sure to include the URL for the article that you have chosen. Your response should be at least 500 words.elements in your descriptions and reasoning.

26 August 2015,
 0

Ellements of reasoning There are eight elements of thought in reasoning. We often use more than one element at the same time. For example, […]


26 August 2015

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Presenting Evidence PPT
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Select and review one innovation or quality tool from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Innovations Exchange  (www.innovations.ahrq.gov/). There are over 650 innovations and 1600 quality tools organized by subject. To assist you in narrowing your search, browse the subject tab. You can select an innovative practice or quality tool using various criteria including disease or clinical category, patient population, stage of care, setting of care, administrative or quality processes, IOM domains of quality. Background reading on the site can be found by linking to “Submit an Innovation” and its sub link “Inclusion Criteria for Heath Care Service Delivery Innovation.”
Once you select an innovative practice or quality tool, review the profile description and prepare a 15 minute presentation (15 slides maximum) describing the innovative practice or quality tool. You must have speaker notes associated with EACH slide that are the words you would say to the audience if you were actually speaking the presentation. You must include the following items (1-7):
Below #1 – #7 = 80%
1.      Title slide that must include innovation or quality tool along with your name (this one slide is not included in slide count). (5%)
2.      Introductory information that describes, summarizes and gives other important facts about the innovation or quality tool (maximum 2 slides). (10%)
3.      Highlight the value of the innovation or quality tool in terms of its impact on health care improvements and quality of care (maximum 10 slides). (40%)
4.      Describe how you as an advanced practice nurse can use the innovation or quality tool to promote an evidence base in your own practice (maximum 2 slides). (10%)
5.      Summary (maximum one slide). (5%)
6.      Reference slide (this one slide is not included in the slide count).
7.      You must develop and include a handout to be distributed to all participants. The handout must summarize the presentation and include significant information as well as a list of references to assist the audience in understanding the innovation or quality tool. This is to be posted to the dropbox along with the PPT. (handout = 10%)


Below (#8) worth 20%
8.      Format criteria below:
a.       Presentation style is consistent with that expected in the professional environment
b.      Presentation skills are consistent with graduate-level expectations
c.       Content of slides and speaker notes is accurate
d.      Speaker notes contain content of the actual presentation and do not repeat slide content – must be associated with each individual slide in presentation. Speaker notes are not a copy/paste from the article but demonstrate true synthesis of the information requested.
e.       Plagiarism check must validate minimal similarity to sources (e.g., small similarity index). Speaker notes must be uploaded as a separate file for plagiarism review only – this file will not be used by faculty for correlation to individual slides in PPT assignment.
f.       Slides contain an appropriate amount of content
g.       Slides are professional in appearance and tone (professional graphics used and copyright not violated)
h.      Slide and speaker notes are free of grammatical, spelling, punctuation, and other errors
i.        Summary is included




26 August 2015,
 0

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Presenting Evidence PPT Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Select and review one innovation or quality tool from […]


‹ Prev page1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 Next page ›