26 August 2015

Federal debt and how it continues to grow

federal debt and how it continues to grow

26 August 2015,
 0

Federal debt and how it continues to grow federal debt and how it continues to grow Click here for more on this paper……. Click […]


26 August 2015

Fareed Zakaria – “The Case for Gun Control”choose ONE of the following articles to assess
• Fareed Zakaria – “The Case for Gun Control”

• John Stossel-“Myths about Gun Control”

Using the “Assessing Arguments” and “Assessing Evidence” handouts online and chapters two and three from Second Thoughts, please do the following:
• Identify the argument being presented for your chosen article
• Stossel’s argues against gun control and his argument consists of him identifying three beliefs about gun control that he thinks are false, or as he calls them, myths. His argument aims to show that these three beliefs are false and are in fact myths. Below are the three myths he identifies. Please identify and list in standard form all of the premises he gives to support why he thinks each is myth (each has 4-6 premises). You can do this by directly quoting and paraphrasing.
• Myth 1 – Gun laws reduce crime and violence. (paragraphs 2-7)
• Myth 2 – Gun ownership is responsible for gun violence (paragraphs 7-10).
• Myth 3 – The Supreme Court ruled the Second Amendment applies only to state militia, not individual citizens. (paragraphs 11-13)
• Zakaria argues for gun control. Part of his argument is for why we need gun control and the other parts of his argument focus on him addressing what he considers are reasons people give against gun control and he argues against these reasons. Below are two of the reasons he identifies and argues against and his own argument for gun control. Please identify and list in standard form all of the premises he gives for each (each has 4-6 premises). You can do this by directly quoting and paraphrasing.
• Argument AGAINST the view that: Gun violence is simply a mental health issue (paragraphs 1-3)
• Argument FOR why we have so much gun violence and need gun control (paragraphs 4-5)
• Argument AGAINST the view that: Gun control is unconstitutional (paragraphs 7-11)
• Assess the argument
• Identify and assess the evidence presented. Assess the evidence by assessing how strong it is and how relevant it is. (Explain your reasoning.)
• Assess the structure or organization of the argument. (Explain your reasoning.)
• Assess the author’s reasoning. (Explain your reasoning.)
• Identify the strengths of the argument and explain why they are strengths.
• Identify the weaknesses of the argument and explain why they are weaknesses.
• Assess whether the reasoning and evidence presented is strong enough to support the conclusion and explain why or why not.
• Suggest ways of improving the argument (be specific and detailed, come up with an example to illustrate, explain how each suggestion will help improve the argument).
• Explain whether the article has had any influence on how you view the issue and why or why not.

Further Assessment Criteria
• Proofreading (spelling, careless mistakes)
• Grammar, syntax, style
• Organization and Clarity

Guidelines:
• Essay should be around 1500-2000 words long (4-5 pages) long. It must be at least 1500 words (4 pages) long and it is okay if it is longer than 2000 words (5 pages).
• Make sure you organize your essay by separating each section as it is separated above.
• It must be 12 point font, double-spaced, 1 inch margins, and use either Garamond or Times New Roman font.
• If you use any additional sources, you must include a bibliography.Monday, Aug. 20, 2012
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
The Case for Gun Control
By Fareed Zakaria
Update Appended: August 10, 2012
After the ghastly act of terrorism against a Sikh temple in Wisconsin on Aug. 5, Americans are pondering how to stop gun violence. We have decided that it is, in the words of New York Times columnist David Brooks, a problem of psychology, not sociology. We are trying to fathom the evil ideology of Wade Michael Page. Only several weeks ago, we were all trying to understand the twisted psychology of James Holmes, the man who killed 12 innocents at a movie theater in Aurora, Colo. Before that it was the mania of Jared Loughner, who shot Congresswoman Gabby Giffords last year.
Certainly we should try to identify such people and help treat and track them. But aside from the immense difficulty of such a task–there are millions of fanatical, crazy people, and very few turn into mass murderers–it misses the real problem.
Gun violence in America is off the chart compared with every other country on the planet. The gun-homicide rate per capita in the U.S. is 30 times that of Britain and Australia, 10 times that of India and four times that of Switzerland. When confronted with such a large deviation, a scholar would ask, Does America have some potential cause for this that is also off the chart? I doubt that anyone seriously thinks we have 30 times as many crazy people as Britain or Australia. But we do have many, many more guns.
There are 88.8 firearms per 100 people in the U.S. In second place is Yemen, with 54.8, then Switzerland with 45.7 and Finland with 45.3. No other country has a rate above 40. The U.S. handgun-ownership rate is 70% higher than that of the country with the next highest rate.
The effect of the increasing ease with which Americans can buy ever more deadly weapons is also obvious. Over the past few decades, crime has been declining, except in one category. In the decade since 2000, violent-crime rates have fallen by 20%, aggravated assault by 21%, motor-vehicle theft by 44.5% and nonfirearm homicides by 22%. But the number of firearm homicides is essentially unchanged. What can explain this anomaly except easier access to guns?
Confronted with this blindingly obvious causal connection, otherwise intelligent people close their eyes. Denouncing any effort to control guns, George Will explained on ABC News that he had “a tragic view of life, which is that … however meticulously you draft whatever statute you wind up passing, the world is going to remain a broken place, and things like this are going to happen.” I don't recall Will responding to, say, the 9/11 attacks–or any other law-and-order issue for that matter–with a “things happen” sentiment.
The other argument against any serious gun control is that it's unconstitutional, an attempt to undo American history. In fact, something close to the opposite is true.
Adam Winkler, a professor of constitutional law at UCLA, documents the actual history in Gunfight: The Battle over the Right to Bear Arms in America. Guns were regulated in the U.S. from the earliest years of the Republic. Laws that banned the carrying of concealed weapons were passed in Kentucky and Louisiana in 1813. Other states soon followed: Indiana in 1820, Tennessee and Virginia in 1838, Alabama in 1839 and Ohio in 1859. Similar laws were passed in Texas, Florida and Oklahoma. As the governor of Texas (Texas!) explained in 1893, the “mission of the concealed deadly weapon is murder. To check it is the duty of every self-respecting, law-abiding man.”
Congress passed the first set of federal laws regulating, licensing and taxing guns in 1934. The act was challenged and went to the U.S. Supreme Court in 1939. Franklin Delano Roosevelt's solicitor general, Robert H. Jackson, said the Second Amendment grants people a right that “is not one which may be utilized for private purposes but only one which exists where the arms are borne in the militia or some other military organization provided for by law and intended for the protection of the state.” The court agreed unanimously.
Things started to change in the 1970s as various right-wing groups coalesced to challenge gun control, overturning laws in state legislatures, Congress and the courts. But Chief Justice Warren Burger, a conservative appointed by Richard Nixon, described the new interpretation of the Second Amendment in an interview after his tenure as “one of the greatest pieces of fraud–I repeat the word fraud–on the American public by special-interest groups that I have ever seen in my lifetime.”
So when people throw up their hands and say we can't do anything about guns, tell them they're being un-American–and unintelligent.

Find this article at:
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2121660,00.html
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
October 19, 2005
Myths About Gun Control
By John Stossel 

Guns are dangerous. But myths are dangerous, too. Myths about guns are very dangerous, because they lead to bad laws. And bad laws kill people.
“Don't tell me this bill will not make a difference,” said President Clinton, who signed the Brady Bill into law.
Sorry. Even the federal government can't say it has made a difference. The Centers for Disease Control did an extensive review of various types of gun control: waiting periods, registration and licensing, and bans on certain firearms. It found that the idea that gun control laws have reduced violent crime is simply a myth.
I wanted to know why the laws weren't working, so I asked the experts. “I'm not going in the store to buy no gun,” said one maximum-security inmate in New Jersey. “So, I could care less if they had a background check or not.”
“There's guns everywhere,” said another inmate. “If you got money, you can get a gun.”
Talking to prisoners about guns emphasizes a few key lessons. First, criminals don't obey the law. (That's why we call them “criminals.”) Second, no law can repeal the law of supply and demand. If there's money to be made selling something, someone will sell it.
A study funded by the Department of Justice confirmed what the prisoners said. Criminals buy their guns illegally and easily. The study found that what felons fear most is not the police or the prison system, but their fellow citizens, who might be armed. One inmate told me, “When you gonna rob somebody you don't know, it makes it harder because you don't know what to expect out of them.”
What if it were legal in America for adults to carry concealed weapons? I put that question to gun-control advocate Rev. Al Sharpton. His eyes opened wide, and he said, “We'd be living in a state of terror!”
In fact, it was a trick question. Most states now have “right to carry” laws. And their people are not living in a state of terror. Not one of those states reported an upsurge in crime.
Why? Because guns are used more than twice as often defensively as criminally. When armed men broke into Susan Gonzalez' house and shot her, she grabbed her husband's gun and started firing. “I figured if I could shoot one of them, even if we both died, someone would know who had been in my home.” She killed one of the intruders. She lived. Studies on defensive use of guns find this kind of thing happens at least 700,000 times a year.
And there's another myth, with a special risk of its own. The myth has it that the Supreme Court, in a case called United States v. Miller, interpreted the Second Amendment — “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” — as conferring a special privilege on the National Guard, and not as affirming an individual right. In fact, what the court held is only that the right to bear arms doesn't mean Congress can't prohibit certain kinds of guns that aren't necessary for the common defense. Interestingly, federal law still says every able-bodied American man from 17 to 44 is a member of the United States militia.
What's the special risk? As Alex Kozinski, a federal appeals judge and an immigrant from Eastern Europe, warned in 2003, “the simple truth — born of experience — is that tyranny thrives best where government need not fear the wrath of an armed people.”
“The prospect of tyranny may not grab the headlines the way vivid stories of gun crime routinely do,” Judge Kozinski noted. “But few saw the Third Reich coming until it was too late. The Second Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances where all other rights have failed — where the government refuses to stand for reelection and silences those who protest; where courts have lost the courage to oppose, or can find no one to enforce their decrees. However improbable these contingencies may seem today, facing them unprepared is a mistake a free people get to make only once.”
�2005 JFS Productions, Inc. Distributed by Creators Syndicate
Send To a Friend
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/Commentary/com-10_19_05_JS.html

26 August 2015,
 0

Fareed Zakaria – “The Case for Gun Control”choose ONE of the following articles to assess • Fareed Zakaria – “The Case for Gun Control” […]


26 August 2015

Proposing a Solution
Assignment Sheet for Writing Project 4: Proposing a Solution
This is your Capstone/Final
In your last assignment, the classical argument, your objective was to effectively persuade and argue for your topic. The next step is to propose an actual working solution to your topic. You have already learned to “wallow in complexity:” to research and analyze, to posit a thesis, antithesis, and synthesis; and to challenge the common ways of looking at a problem. Hopefully, this semester your accompanying research helped you to become more critical consumers of the material you read, and to develop the curiosity to generate significant and problematic questions. 
In your Capstone assignment, you will apply those skills as you write a proposalwhere you will propose a solution for the problem you’ve been studying. Your aim is to make an argument that calls an audience to action.  You’ll make a claim that some action should or ought to be taken, and then you’ll offer a solution to one of the problems you identified in your Exploratory Essay. 
As stated in Allyn & Bacon, “for every proposal there is always an alternative course of action, including doing nothing.” Your task as a proposal writer is threefold: demonstrate that a significant problem exists; propose a solution to the problem; and justify the solution, showing how the benefits outweigh the costs and that the proposed solution will fix the problem better than alternative solutions would.”  Your essay should contain the following three parts:
  • a description of the problem
  • a proposal for a solution
  • a justification for the solution
Your introduction should get your audience’s attention (possibly by appealing to pathos), provide background on the conversation you are joining, and clearly state the claim you intend to support.  The body of your argument should appeal to logos by presenting reasons and evidence in support of your position, as well as appeal to ethos by responding to opposing views (rebutting the counterargument).  You may also appeal to pathos within your body by appealing to the values and beliefs of your audience. 
This is a research paper. In addition to the research you did for the Exploratory, you should continue researching.  The Works Cited page of your final paper must include no less than 7 secondary sources. (At least one firsthand source is preferred but not required).
Peer Review 4/17 Turnitin.com 4/24.
Length:1800-2000 words minimum with a Works Cited page
This is your FINAL/CAPSTONE. No Late papers will be accepted.
Grading Criteria:

  • Does the essay contribute something new to the subject?
  •  Does the writer make a convincing argument as to why her audience should or ought to take action?
  • Is the proposed action (or “claim”) clearly identified and explained?
  • Is the proposed action feasible, financially, politically, and socially?
  • Is this claim logically supported by reasons and evidence?
  • Have possible objections to the underlying assumptions (warrants) linking the claim and reasons been addressed?
  • Have opposing views been addressed?
  • Does the paper provide adequate background on the problem the author is attempting to remedy?
  • Does the essay use credible, relevant sources?
  • Does the essay use appropriate style and tone?
  • Is there evidence of an effective writing process? (three drafts, lose ½ grade for each missing)
  • Is there a logical progression and organization of thoughts?
  • Smooth transitions between ideas/ paragraphs?
  • Use of appropriate college-level spelling, grammar and mechanics?
  • MLA format, in-text citations, and Works Cited page?

26 August 2015,
 0

Proposing a Solution Assignment Sheet for Writing Project 4: Proposing a Solution This is your Capstone/Final In your last assignment, the classical argument, your […]


26 August 2015

Down syndrome in female fertility

Down syndrome in female fertility

26 August 2015,
 0

Down syndrome in female fertility Down syndrome in female fertility Click here for more on this paper……. Click here to have a similar A+ […]


26 August 2015

Satisfaction of patients (Discussion part)

Satisfaction of patients (Discussion part)

26 August 2015,
 0

Satisfaction of patients (Discussion part) Satisfaction of patients (Discussion part) Click here for more on this paper……. Click here to have a similar A+ […]


‹ Prev page1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 Next page ›